13 February 2008

When will come the end?

Before embarking on a journey of revenge, first dig two graves. --Chinese proverb

Or, in this case, a grave big enough to bury the entire sport of cycling. So the ASO wants revenge, do they? Well, they best beware what they wish for, as they may just get it. But it could well spell their own demise as well. Stooping to the level of those you despise only makes you no different and no better than them. Petulance, small-mindedness, and revenge are not traits that will endear the ASO, or the UCI for that matter, to anyone.

If the Astana of 2008 is not good enough, then what team is? Rabobank? Surely not, as they still have the same DS who knowingly allowed Rasmussen to smear his filthy lies all over the Tour's sacred yellow jersey last year. CSC? Surely not, Riis befouled the Tour as badly as anyone. Cofidis? Surely not, Moreni was blatantly slapping on the testosterone gel amidst the Tour's pomp and circumstance last year. Slipstream? Surely not, David Millar once took dope. Do you see where this is going? Nowhere at all. It quickly becomes idiotic and ridiculous to go down this road. If you want to punish every team that ever was full of dopers, then there will be no teams at the Tour. Not one. Let's just get this straight: cycling's past is absolutely rife with dopers. Dopers everywhere you look, on every team, from every country, in every place in the GC from the top to the lanterne rouge. At some point it must become a useless and contradictory game to continually play "let's blame the dopers of the past for all our troubles." Picking out Astana as the one big villain is idiotic, when there are enough other bad-guys to fill a stadium. Also, is it really a good idea for Damsgaard's anti-doping plan to be panned with such impunity? If Damsgaard's plan is not good enough for Astana, then why is it good enough for CSC?

I am so tired of this. I am tired of chronicling an almost unimaginably dysfunctional sport. I am saddened by reading the floods of angry emails from disgruntled cycling fans whose potent disillusion only grows by the day. I am tired of watching the UCI and the ASO viciously attacking each other without ever considering that the real victim of their war is the sport itself, which lies bleeding to death at their feet, ignored and forgotten. In such a battle, death may well come to both opponents, and richly would they both deserve it, after the way they each have wielded their power with such recklessness and irresponsibility. I am tired of so-called anti-doping actions which do nothing to reduce doping, and are only indicative of selfishness, greed, larger long-held grudges, and deeper hidden agendas. I am tired of letting the past rule and destroy the future. Who has the courage and the vision to stop such an endless downward spiral? What team or rider or fan can now look upon the upcoming season with anything but a looming sense of dread. The upcoming threat of multiple boycotts, months of public recriminations, chaos, and worst of all, many a riders' greatest dreams destroyed, makes me feel sick and sad and powerless. Do the riders, who already struggle and suffer so much to pursue their passion, deserve such a fate as to be treated with such total disregard and disdain by the very people who are supposedly charged with organizing the best races and governing the sport?

The ASO is angry. They have seen their flagship event smeared year after year by a cast of such irredeemable reprobates and con-men that no one can blame them for wanting to get even. Yet at the same time, when great power is wielded irresponsibly, who does that make look bad? The ASO, not the dopers. They have today shown a strange lack of logic, punishing riders such as Chris Horner for the crimes of riders like Vino. A spiral of revenge only will serve to further destroy the sport. Potential new sponsors will look upon this nonsensical storm of mayhem and wonder how a sport can possibly be so dysfunctional and even continue to exist. Innocent riders who are caught in the crossfire of a battle driven by greed and power-hungry politicos find their dreams crushed without a second thought, no matter if they have in fact fully embraced the idea of clean cycling.

There is no going back, but also no going forward if ASO has their way. Who should turn the other cheek? The riders, who are often the powerless ones already, or the UCI, who has mismanaged the sport to the brink of disaster? Or the ASO, who could be the ones to set a new course for the future, if they had the courage to do it. At some point, it has to end. At some point I have to decide that I don't care if Contador was dirty once at some point in the past, I must only care if he is clean NOW and will be clean in the races this season. If I can say with some degree of certainty that he will be, then fine, let him ride. There must come an end to this at some point. That is not to say that we should not be well-educated and aware of the history of doping, but only that we cannot let it hold hostage the future. If Damsgaard's anti-doping program is not the best out there, then I would like to know whose is better? If I cannot believe that Damsgaard can catch Contador if he tries to dope, then there is no hope left at all. If we cannot say that there will be an end to the insanity of the ASO vs UCI war, an end to the petty squabbling, an end to the playing of favorites, and the start of a new chance, then there is no point to going on. Let the sport die and let us stand at its grave and weep at the indignity and stupidity of a needless, pointless death. The future cannot be found in hating the past ever more, in punishing today's riders for the sins of the doped generations of cycling's history. If biological passports, and team anti-doping programs such as ACE or Damsgaard, are to be given a chance to prove their worth, then the teams who use these anti-doping methods absolutely must be given a fair chance to truly show and prove their efficacy amidst the heavy pressures and demands of a full schedule of races.

But I am tired of writing these empty, angry rants. I wanted to write about Danielson winning the climb of Mt. Faron in the Tour of the Med. I want to write about Remy DiGregorio becoming a new French icon. I want to write about Thor Hushovd beating McEwen. I want to write about Frank Schleck helping his brother up the last climb of the Tour's queen stage to let Andy take the yellow jersey. I want to write about Jens stealing a Tour stage in a blazing breakaway. I want to write about Sastre winning a Grand Tour. I want to write about Z or Millar winning a big time trial. I want to write about Martijn Maaskant or Farrar winning a classic. I want to write about Ciolek and Cav beating Boonen. I want to write about Michael Barry riding in the Tour de France at long last. I want to write about some unknown, unheralded neo-pro breaking through with a courageous win and then collapsing in sobs in the arms of his soigneur. I want to write about the courage of riders who come back from terrible injuries and illnesses. About the noble tolerance of suffering and the beauty of the grace, spirit, and purity of the sport at its finest moments. Where have these moments gone? When will come the end of the dark days of cycling's current ugly stalemate?

15 comments:

PJ said...

Bravo. No one has said it better. Thanks.

steephill said...

"When will come the end of the dark days of cycling's current ugly stalemate?"

As the saying goes, it's always darkest before the dawn.

"But I am tired of writing these empty, angry rants.... I want to write about Remy DiGregorio becoming a new French icon..."

For your own sake, I think you should write about Remy the rat from Ratatouille. Personally, every time I get frustrated with pro bike racing, I work on recreational touring report. Not coincidentally, I'm going to post a new one tomorrow.

Seriously, until the pro riders' union is willing to take serious counter action, the sport will remain rudderless.

Good rant by the way. You're good at it. Your poor wife?

Anonymous said...

Fantastic post. It puts focus to my befuddlement about this whole mess.

We keep thinking we're at the bottom then someone takes it to a new low.

Anonymous said...

i am confused and angry. i so wish your last paragraph could be true, it was so beautiful, it bought a tear to my eye. damn aso!

Anonymous said...

Yes, you are tired as I am, as a lot of people and probably as ASO are with the continuing stream and cycles of doping, denials, doping, denials, doping, denials.
Teams, DS, riders:"
We will do better next year. We promise to stop doping"
Teams, DS, riders:"
We will do better next year. We promise to stop doping"
Teams, DS, riders:"
We will do better next year. We promise to stop doping"
Teams, DS, riders:"
We will do better next year. We promise to stop doping"

But all has failed. Deseperation.

Clearly there is one team dirties than others.

Anonymous said...

Sponsors know now if their team failed repetitive doping test the team will be stay at home. Not on first failure.

Sponsors know that ASO and TDF are trying to restore respectability and dignity to TDF which are necessary to secure TV broadcasting and media. With less medias and less exposure of TDF team sponsoring has less values.
So Astana exclusion is good for team sponsors!

Igor Oliveira said...

GREAT TEXT!

THE BEST THAT I'VE READ ABOUT CYCLING AT THIS MOMENT

kevin said...

I agree with you entirely, It should be compulsory reading for McQuaid and the ASO whose very public political dispute is threatening to split cycling in two. What is even more worrying is the spectre of Puerto reopening to coincide with the TDF.
Yes cycling has always had cheats, from the time a rider caught a train to gain time, but at least now it is seriously trying to confront it.

KG

Anonymous said...

Cycling died for me yesterday. I refuse to follow a sport that is so screwed up any longer.
Thanks for your great blog cfa, it has been priceless!
Signing out from cycling, Adios.
Bruce

Anonymous said...

Why are you so upset over Astana being excluded?

Do you think Astana made any kind of effort to ride clean last year? Do you think hiring Bruyneel indicates any kind of accountability on anti-doping?

And since when are we talking about a "clean break"? What have the authorities accomplished that makes you think each team deserves a clean slate?

You have a point that if Astana is excluded, then Rabobank, Caisse, and CSC should also be excluded. Frankly that would be a good thing too. Instead of bemoaning the ASO/UCI's functionality, you should praise the ASO, and advocate for a more consistent approach.

Who needs Astana? The Tour should strive for credibility and respectability. To hell with the doping teams. To hell with the UCI.

Anonymous said...

CFA - Great post as usual. I too am frustrated and angry. But I still love the sport, love to ride, and look forward to a better day ahead - at least for my son who is now 15 months old. In the meantime, I would recommend you go back to the youtube clip of 'Always Look on the Brightside of Life' - and stay away from sharp objects and ledges.

Cheers

Anonymous said...

Great stuff, but re-read what Prudhomme said about Astana and the other teams and the ASO's reasons for excluding who they did. If Astana want to ride next year, they have to prove themselves - how many tests has Damsgaard done this year, and where are the results?

I too want to hear about racing, and read your writing about it. But if the Tour is not to be overshadowed by doping stories we have to have a fresh start. ASO made a risk assessment and saw a potential problem with Astana, it's that simple.

Hang in there: the grace, spirit and purity will be back...

Anonymous said...

Astana is the scape goat. The ASO is saying look, you screw the bull then you get the horn. The Tour will still be the Tour. Even if none of the Pro squads went and they used a bunch of B teams. I feel sorry for Astana, particularly Leipheimer and Kloeden who are nearing the end of their careers. Not too many T de F left for them. If anything this move by the ASO will make teams wake up and smell the coffee.

davekea said...

But by excluding team Astana and Contador you will fore ever have the question is the real winner ridding in the tour de France this year or better yet is the best of the best cycling. Secondly if you exclude one team exclude all teams that where caught doping be fair.

The Yorkshireman said...

I really cannot go along with the view that the ASO and the UCI are equally to blame for the mess cycling is in. To a very large degree it is the UCI who have led the sport to the brink, what with their long-term 'See no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil' attitude to doping. (For example, consider the way Verbruggen dismissed the revelations of people like Graham Obree and Gilles Delion). Today McQuaid displays much the same attitude, as is evidenced by his fatuous claim that organised doping no longer exists and that races are faster these days because "the wind is different'! (See http://www.thepulse2007.org/?p=73 ). It even seems that the UCI have at times gone out of their way to protect dopers and those suspected of doping. One good example is the way Hein Verbruggen commissioned that biased and misleading report on the work of the LNDD in the wake of Armstrong's retrospective 'positives' for EPO use in the 1999 Tour. This report gives every appearance of being little more than a 'hatchet job' cynically calculated to protect the UCI's icon of 'global cycling'.

Those who believe that the ASO are not genuinely concerned about the effect doping is having on the Tour, (or who believe that all 'the French' are interested in is 'engineering' a French win…) should think back to the way Jean-Marie Leblanc of the ASO fought to have Richard Virenque - France's biggest prospect for a Tour win since Bernard Hinault - excluded from the Tour in the wake of the Festina scandal. Back in 1999 Leblanc said that Virenque's presence is the Tour was "incompatible to the image and reputation of the event we want to preserve." When the UCI once again sided with the dopers and insisted that he be given a place Leblanc's response was "If Virenque won the Tour, it would be a very serious setback for our race".)

Given the astonishing degree of unprofessionalism he has shown since taking office, it is surely time for Pat McQuaid to resign. His only real talents appear to be for megaphone diplomacy and hypocrisy. He argued that the organisers of the Tour of California have the full right to decide who rides their events, but denies that the ASO have the same right. He backed the organisers of the Giro when they initially excluded Astana, but attacks the ASO for refusing to invite Astana to ride the Tour de France. He argued that it is wrong for the ASO to fail to invite Astana on the basis of their past record, and then went ahead and banned Frank Vandenbroucke from all 'ProTour' events on the same grounds! He has argued that the ASO are 'blackmailing' riders, claims he has the interests of the riders at heart and says that he will do everything to defend the supposed 'right' of Contador to ride the Tour (regardless of his implication in the Puerto affair), and yet he has also threatened to ban any rider who takes part in the Paris Nice from all races held under UCI rules for up to 6 months!

To his disgrace McQuaid has also repeatedly resorted to narrow-minded, anti-French rhetoric. Perhaps McQuaid is simply a xenophobe. This might explain his claim that cycling's doping problem is due to the existence of "mafia Western European nations" whose values should be compared with those countries belonging to some mythical, whiter-than-white "Anglo-Saxon culture". This claim has a certain irony given that in the case of Astana it is "Anglo-Saxon'" McQuaid who opposes the implementation of more robust anti-doping measures! Xenophobe or not much of what McQuaid says, (such as his claim that the refusal of the ASO to invite Astana to ride the Tour "was a decision made in France by a French organisation purely for the French public") gives every appearance of being calculated to gain support from those who themselves harbour anti-French prejudices. For example, those who seriously believe that the refusal by the ASO to offer an invite to Astana is part of a supposed 'plot' by the ASO (or should that be 'The French'?...) to 'stop Leipheimer winning the Tour'. (These are probably the same people who believe that Landis was clean but was 'framed' by 'the French', an absolutely ludicrous suggestion given that the ASO needed the Landis doping scandal about as much a bullet in the head!).

In reality the McQuaid/ASO split is about 3 main issues, all one way or another related to the (in the words of Brian Cookson, head of British Cycling) "problematic and divisive" 'ProTour' concept. Firstly there is the desire of the UCI to dictate to the organisers of the sport's major events who gets to ride in those events. Relatedly there is the failure of the UCI to tackle (and even complicity in) the doping problem over the years, something which has led the sport to the brink. The result of this is that those with a financial interest in the sport can no longer risk another doping scandal and so, quite understandably, want to retain full control over who they invite to ride in their events.

Perhaps the biggest issue of all is number three. TV rights. The UCI clearly intends that race organisers should no longer have full control to the TV rights to the sport's major events on the basis that these form part of the 'ProTour brand'. In effect the UCI are telling organisers that the events they own and run no longer 'belong' to them and that the UCI is moving in with the intention of making a grab for the money to be made from the TV rights to events, in particular the Tour de France.

Even as the McQuaid/ASO battle rages, Hein Verbruggen (McQuaid's ever-present shadow) is reported as being in negotiations with several investment companies interested in buying of the rights to televised cycle sport. These include the British CVC Capital Partners group, the Belgian production company Woestijnvis and The Rothschild Group. (See
http://tinyurl.com/2bt5hn ).

If it wasn't bad enough that the UCI sold 'ProTour' licences on promises they were in no position to honour, now they are playing a role in selling of the TV rights to events they don't even own or organise! McQuaid has lost all credibility having made threats he will be unable to follow up without damaging the careers of half the peleton. He is autocratic, seemingly uninterested in negotiation or compromise and sees any voice of dissent as being proof of 'disloyalty', demanding that the dissenter resign from any UCI related post. (As with his demand that AIGCP president Eric Boyer resign from the ProTour Council). He clearly does not have the support of the riders themselves and is increasingly isolated having now suspended any official contact with the AIGCP. On top of all this the UCI are now taking legal action against Dick Pound/WADA in response to the Pound's perfectly valid criticism of the UCI historically lax attitude to doping.

For the good of cycling it's time for McQuaid (and Verbruggen) to go and for the UCI to both stop acting outside it's remit and giving the impression that it believes that the role of the ASO is to act as a 'cash cow' for the UCI and the rest of cycling.

As to the claim that the ASO is being inconsistent, I would suggest that a line has to be drawn somewhere and that the sort of organised team-level '800ml of packed cells' style of doping which clearly existed (and quite possibly still exists) at Astana provides a much stronger reason for the exclusion of a team than the use of a testosterone patch by a rider apparently acting on their own 'initiative' as with Morini.